Feasibility
Assess the fit: asset, issuer, jurisdiction, objective, constraints, delivery options and dependencies.
Global tokenization services
Align your fund structure, investor needs and digital infrastructure in a practical implementation plan.
Approach
Assess the fit: asset, issuer, jurisdiction, objective, constraints, delivery options and dependencies.
Coordinate requirements, providers, infrastructure choices, testing and launch responsibilities.
Define scoped operational support, reporting coordination, change control and provider exit planning.
Services
Assess fund structure, investor needs, jurisdictions, documents, provider options, cost categories and the business case before implementation commitments.
Coordinate requirements, provider selection, infrastructure planning, testing and launch responsibilities against an agreed scope.
Define post-launch workflows, reporting coordination, change control, recovery paths and provider exit procedures without implying regulated administrator or custodian status.
About
Feasibility, implementation planning and scoped operational support for fund tokenization.
Advalok provides global tokenization services specializing in funds, helping managers and issuers assess whether tokenized fund interests make operational and commercial sense.
The work begins with the fund structure, investors, jurisdictions, records and operating requirements. Each engagement defines the professional roles, infrastructure path, dependencies and scope before delivery proceeds.
Request an assessmentPartner
Aryalok and Advalok are distinct. Advalok enquiries are handled for tokenization assessment only unless a visitor deliberately requests an introduction.
Fit
There is a fund, issuer or sponsor; investor needs and jurisdiction questions can be examined; and the business needs a scoped path before choosing tokenization infrastructure.
The objective depends on guaranteed liquidity, public investor solicitation, instant issuance or using tokens to bypass legal, tax or regulatory advice.
FAQ
Tokenization means representing an asset or an interest in it as a digital token on a shared ledger. For funds, this commonly means digitally representing shares or units. FCA fund tokenisation
It changes how fund interests are recorded and potentially transferred or serviced. The investment strategy can remain the same.
Not necessarily. Blockchain-based fund records can represent conventional investments; investing in crypto is a separate concept.
Fund interests, shares, bonds and interests linked to property or private credit can be assessed. Legal structure determines the rights represented and eligible investors.
Money market, private credit, private equity, venture, real estate and infrastructure strategies can be assessed. Fit depends on structure, investors, dealing terms and operating needs.
Tokenization may support better coordinated investor records, automated workflows and new distribution arrangements. Start with a measurable problem, not a technology label.
Yes, live institutional implementations exist. Adoption is developing and remains small relative to conventional markets. Project Guardian
Define fund rights and rules, design records and operating processes, select infrastructure, test the combined model, then launch within approved scope.
Potentially, after reviewing documents, required approvals, providers and reconciliation with existing records.
Not necessarily. Investor interests can be tokenized while underlying portfolio assets stay in existing systems.
Rights depend on the legal structure. Direct fund interests, indirect entitlements and contractual exposure are not interchangeable.
It is often worth assessing first. Compatibility, responsibilities and integrations determine what changes.
Identity checks, eligibility, documents and permitted accounts or wallets form part of the designed workflow.
Models may use investor-controlled wallets, custody or platform-managed access. Assess recovery and regulatory requirements alongside usability.
Decide after security, privacy, permissions, cost, provider support and integration requirements are defined.
There is no single worldwide permission. Product, rights, activities, domicile and investor markets determine requirements.
Applicable provincial and territorial securities, offering, registration and investor requirements still apply; a token is not an exemption. CSA guidance
Securities laws and registration or exemptions apply. The SEC January 2026 staff statement describes models, not blanket approval or a new law. SEC statement
Financial-instrument tokens are excluded from MiCA scope; fund and securities frameworks need assessment. The DLT Pilot applies to eligible infrastructure, not universal fund authorization. ESMA MiCA scope
FCA PS26/7 final guidance and direct-to-fund dealing rules took effect 30 April 2026. Applicable fund, investor-protection and operational duties remain. FCA PS26/7
ADGM is a distinct jurisdiction. Securities-characteristic tokens, including fund units, can fall under relevant FSRA digital-securities rules. ADGM guidance
DIFC has a DFSA Investment Token framework; VARA jurisdiction excludes DIFC. No single Dubai crypto licence covers every activity. DFSA framework
Tokenized capital-markets products fall under relevant existing securities frameworks. Licensing and offering requirements depend on the product and service. MAS speech
Cost and timing are scoped to fund structure, jurisdictions, providers, integrations, approvals and testing. There is no universal price or duration.
No automatic liquidity. Buyers, asset liquidity, fund restrictions and redemption terms still matter.
Network availability does not override dealing windows, approved venues, settlement arrangements or transfer restrictions.
Some workflows may be streamlined, while technology and oversight add costs. Evaluate the full business case.
Tokenization itself does not guarantee investment performance.
Smaller denominations do not remove eligibility, minimum subscriptions or offering restrictions.
Smart contracts can enforce selected controls. Legal interpretation, governance and monitoring still require accountable people.
Assess code, access controls, custody, providers and recovery, not only the ledger. FSB tokenisation risks
Establish recovery, records access, custody and exit procedures before launch.
Define on-chain visibility and keep personal documents and sensitive records in appropriately restricted systems.
Tokenization does not remove tax analysis. Structure, investors and jurisdictions need qualified advice.
Yes, a defined use case can be assessed before broader implementation. The pilot scope should include records, approvals, recovery and exit planning.
Prepare fund documents, investor profile, dealing terms, current service providers, target jurisdictions, operational pain points and intended outcomes.
Ownership, access, audit rights, recovery, portability and provider exit should be defined before launch.
Request assessment
Share a short overview of what you want to achieve. We’ll review whether an assessment is a useful next step.
Please don’t include identity documents, financial records or other confidential materials here.